23 data to include in the business plan of your fintech company

This article was written by our expert who is surveying the industry and constantly updating the business plan for a fintech company.

Our business plan for a fintech company will help you build a profitable project

Ever pondered what the ideal customer acquisition cost should be to ensure your fintech startup remains competitive?

Or how many monthly active users you need to achieve to meet your growth projections?

And do you know the optimal transaction success rate for a digital payment platform?

These aren’t just interesting figures; they’re the metrics that can determine the success or failure of your venture.

If you’re crafting a business plan, investors and financial institutions will scrutinize these numbers to gauge your strategy and potential for success.

In this article, we’ll explore 23 critical data points every fintech business plan must include to demonstrate your readiness and capability to thrive.

Regulatory compliance costs can consume 10-15% of a fintech's operating budget

Regulatory compliance costs can consume 10-15% of a fintech's operating budget because fintech companies operate in a highly regulated environment that requires significant resources to navigate.

These companies must adhere to a wide range of regulatory requirements, including data protection, anti-money laundering, and consumer protection laws. Ensuring compliance with these regulations often involves hiring specialized staff, investing in technology, and conducting regular audits, all of which contribute to the high costs.

Moreover, the complexity and volume of regulations can vary significantly depending on the specific financial services offered by the fintech.

For instance, a fintech dealing with cross-border transactions may face more stringent compliance requirements compared to one that operates solely within a single country. Additionally, the size and scale of the fintech can also impact compliance costs, as larger companies may need to implement more comprehensive systems to manage their regulatory obligations effectively.

Customer acquisition cost (CAC) should ideally be recouped within 12 months to ensure sustainable growth

In the fintech world, it's crucial for a company to recoup its Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) within 12 months to maintain sustainable growth.

This timeframe ensures that the company can reinvest profits into acquiring new customers, which is essential for scaling. If the CAC is not recovered quickly, the company might face cash flow issues and struggle to fund further growth.

However, the ideal CAC recovery period can vary depending on the specific business model and market conditions.

For instance, a fintech company offering subscription-based services might have a longer acceptable CAC recovery period due to predictable recurring revenue. On the other hand, a company relying on one-time transactions may need to recover CAC more quickly to stay competitive and profitable.

Fintechs should aim for a customer lifetime value (CLV) to CAC ratio of at least 3:1

Fintechs should aim for a customer lifetime value (CLV) to customer acquisition cost (CAC) ratio of at least 3:1 because it indicates that the company is generating three times more revenue from a customer than it costs to acquire them, ensuring profitability and sustainability.

This ratio is crucial because it helps fintechs understand the balance between their marketing expenses and the revenue generated from customers. A higher ratio means that the company is efficiently acquiring customers and maximizing their value, which is essential for growth and long-term success.

However, the ideal CLV to CAC ratio can vary depending on the specific business model and market conditions of the fintech.

For instance, a fintech offering high-margin products might achieve a higher ratio more easily than one with lower margins. Additionally, startups in a growth phase might accept a lower ratio temporarily as they focus on scaling and capturing market share.

Transaction fees typically range from 1-3% of the transaction value, depending on the service

Transaction fees in fintech typically range from 1-3% because they cover the costs of processing payments and providing secure, reliable services.

These fees can vary based on the type of transaction and the specific service provider. For instance, credit card transactions often incur higher fees due to the risk of fraud and the need for additional security measures.

On the other hand, ACH transfers might have lower fees because they are generally considered lower risk and involve less processing complexity.

Additionally, the volume of transactions a business processes can influence the fee percentage, with higher volumes often leading to negotiated lower rates. Ultimately, the specific fee structure is determined by a combination of these factors, ensuring that the fintech company can maintain its operations while providing value to its customers.

Fintechs should maintain a minimum capital adequacy ratio of 8% to meet regulatory requirements

Fintechs are required to maintain a minimum capital adequacy ratio of 8% to ensure they have enough financial buffer to absorb potential losses and protect their customers.

This requirement is crucial because fintech companies often deal with highly volatile markets and need to demonstrate financial stability to gain trust from both regulators and customers. By maintaining this ratio, fintechs can also ensure they have sufficient capital to support their ongoing operations and growth.

However, the specific capital adequacy ratio can vary depending on the risk profile of the fintech and the regulatory environment in which it operates.

For instance, a fintech dealing with higher-risk financial products might be required to maintain a higher ratio to account for potential losses. Conversely, a fintech with a more stable and predictable business model might be allowed a lower ratio, as their risk exposure is less significant.

Churn rate should be kept below 5% monthly to maintain a stable user base

In the fintech industry, maintaining a churn rate below 5% monthly is crucial for ensuring a stable user base.

High churn rates can lead to significant revenue loss and increased costs associated with acquiring new customers. Keeping churn low helps in maintaining a consistent cash flow and allows the company to focus on improving services rather than constantly replacing lost users.

However, the ideal churn rate can vary depending on the specific business model and target market of the fintech company.

For instance, a company offering niche financial services might experience higher churn due to a smaller target audience, while a company with a broad appeal might maintain a lower churn rate more easily. Ultimately, understanding the unique dynamics of your user base and continuously improving the customer experience are key to managing churn effectively.

Fintechs should allocate 15-20% of their budget to cybersecurity to protect against breaches

Fintech companies should allocate 15-20% of their budget to cybersecurity because they handle sensitive financial data that is highly attractive to cybercriminals.

Given the nature of their operations, fintechs are often targeted by hackers looking to exploit vulnerabilities for financial gain. Investing a significant portion of the budget in cybersecurity helps to mitigate risks and protect both the company and its customers from potential breaches.

However, the exact percentage of budget allocation can vary depending on the size and complexity of the fintech company.

Smaller fintech startups might allocate a smaller percentage due to limited resources, but they should still prioritize cybersecurity to build trust with their users. On the other hand, larger fintech firms with more complex systems and higher transaction volumes may need to invest even more than 20% to ensure comprehensive protection against sophisticated threats.

Partnering with banks can reduce time-to-market by up to 50% for new financial products

Partnering with banks can significantly reduce the time-to-market for new financial products by up to 50% for fintech companies.

Banks already have established regulatory frameworks and compliance processes in place, which fintech companies can leverage to avoid lengthy approval processes. Additionally, banks possess a vast customer base and distribution networks, allowing fintechs to quickly reach a wider audience without building these from scratch.

However, the extent of time reduction can vary depending on the specific nature of the partnership and the product being developed.

For instance, if a fintech is developing a product that requires deep integration with a bank's existing systems, the time savings might be less pronounced due to technical complexities. Conversely, if the product is more standalone and leverages the bank's existing infrastructure, the time-to-market can be drastically reduced.

Fintechs should aim for a break-even point within 24 months to be considered viable

Fintechs should aim for a break-even point within 24 months to be considered viable because this timeframe aligns with investor expectations and market dynamics.

Investors typically look for a quick return on investment, and a two-year window is often seen as a reasonable period to assess a company's potential for profitability. Additionally, the fintech industry is highly competitive, and reaching break-even quickly can demonstrate a company's ability to adapt and thrive in a fast-paced environment.

However, this timeline can vary depending on the specific business model and market conditions.

For instance, fintechs focusing on disruptive technologies or those entering emerging markets might require more time to establish themselves and achieve profitability. Conversely, fintechs offering niche services with a clear demand might reach break-even sooner due to a more targeted customer base and lower competition.

Customer support should resolve 80% of inquiries within the first contact to ensure satisfaction

Resolving 80% of customer inquiries on the first contact is crucial for a fintech company because it significantly enhances customer satisfaction and builds trust.

In the fast-paced world of fintech, customers expect quick and efficient solutions to their problems, and a high first-contact resolution rate meets this expectation. When issues are resolved promptly, it reduces the need for customers to repeatedly contact support, which can lead to frustration and dissatisfaction.

However, the ability to resolve inquiries on the first contact can vary depending on the complexity of the issue.

For straightforward issues like password resets or account access problems, achieving a high first-contact resolution rate is more feasible. On the other hand, more complex issues, such as fraud investigations or technical glitches, may require additional time and resources, making it challenging to resolve them immediately.

Fintechs should reserve 5-10% of revenue for technology upgrades and innovation annually

Fintech companies should allocate 5-10% of their revenue for technology upgrades and innovation annually to stay competitive and meet evolving customer expectations.

In the fast-paced world of financial technology, staying ahead of the curve is crucial, as new technologies and customer demands are constantly emerging. By investing in technology upgrades, fintechs can ensure their platforms remain secure, efficient, and user-friendly, which is essential for maintaining customer trust and satisfaction.

Moreover, dedicating a portion of revenue to innovation allows fintechs to explore new opportunities and develop cutting-edge solutions that can differentiate them from competitors.

However, the exact percentage of revenue allocated can vary depending on the company's size, market position, and growth stage. For instance, a startup fintech might need to invest more heavily in innovation to establish itself, while a more established company might focus on maintaining and enhancing existing technologies.

It's common for fintechs to lose 1-2% of revenue due to fraud or chargebacks

It's common for fintechs to lose 1-2% of revenue due to fraud or chargebacks because these companies often operate in a high-risk environment where digital transactions are prevalent.

Fintech companies, by their nature, handle a large volume of online transactions, which are more susceptible to fraudulent activities compared to traditional in-person transactions. Additionally, the rapid pace of innovation in fintech can sometimes outstrip the development of robust security measures, leaving gaps that fraudsters can exploit.

Moreover, the global reach of many fintech platforms exposes them to a wider array of fraud tactics and regulatory challenges.

However, the impact of fraud and chargebacks can vary significantly depending on the specific business model and the types of services offered by the fintech. For instance, companies focusing on peer-to-peer payments might face different fraud risks compared to those offering investment services, necessitating tailored strategies to mitigate these losses.

Marketing expenses should not exceed 10-15% of total revenue to maintain financial health

In the fintech industry, maintaining marketing expenses within 10-15% of total revenue is crucial for ensuring the company's financial health.

Spending beyond this range can lead to cash flow issues and reduce the ability to invest in other critical areas like technology development and customer support. By keeping marketing costs in check, fintech companies can ensure they have enough resources to scale operations and improve their product offerings.

However, this percentage can vary depending on the company's growth stage and market conditions.

For instance, a startup might allocate a higher percentage to marketing to quickly gain market share, while a more established company might focus on optimizing existing customer relationships. Ultimately, the key is to balance marketing spend with other business needs to ensure sustainable growth and long-term success.

Fintechs should aim for a net promoter score (NPS) of 50 or higher to indicate strong customer loyalty

Fintechs should aim for a net promoter score (NPS) of 50 or higher because it indicates a high level of customer satisfaction and loyalty.

In the competitive world of fintech, a strong NPS can be a key differentiator, helping companies stand out in a crowded market. A score of 50 or above suggests that a significant portion of customers are enthusiastic promoters of the brand, which can lead to organic growth through word-of-mouth recommendations.

However, the ideal NPS can vary depending on the specific target audience and market segment a fintech company is operating in.

For instance, a fintech serving a niche market with complex financial products might find that a slightly lower NPS is acceptable if their customers are highly engaged and loyal. Conversely, a fintech offering more mainstream services might need a higher NPS to compete effectively against larger, established players in the industry.

Effective data analytics can increase revenue by 10-20% by identifying upsell opportunities

Effective data analytics can boost revenue by 10-20% for fintech companies by pinpointing upsell opportunities.

By analyzing customer behavior and transaction patterns, fintech firms can identify which clients are most likely to benefit from additional services or products. This allows them to tailor their marketing efforts and offer personalized recommendations that resonate with individual needs.

Moreover, data analytics helps in understanding customer lifetime value, enabling companies to focus on high-value clients who are more likely to respond to upsell offers.

However, the impact of data analytics can vary depending on factors like the company's existing customer base and the complexity of its product offerings. For instance, a fintech company with a diverse range of services might see a higher increase in revenue compared to one with a more limited product line.

Fintechs should maintain a current ratio (assets to liabilities) of 1.5:1 for financial stability

Maintaining a current ratio of 1.5:1 is crucial for fintech companies to ensure they have enough liquid assets to cover their short-term liabilities.

This ratio indicates that for every dollar of liability, the company has $1.50 in assets, providing a buffer against financial instability. It helps fintechs manage unexpected expenses or downturns without needing to secure additional funding, which can be costly or difficult to obtain.

However, the ideal current ratio can vary depending on the specific business model and risk profile of the fintech.

For instance, a fintech with a steady cash flow might operate safely with a lower ratio, while a startup in a volatile market might need a higher ratio to cushion against uncertainties. Ultimately, the key is to balance liquidity with operational efficiency, ensuring the company can meet its obligations while still investing in growth opportunities.

Regulatory changes can impact up to 30% of a fintech's operational processes, requiring agile adaptation

Regulatory changes can significantly impact a fintech company's operations, potentially affecting up to 30% of their processes, because these companies operate in a highly regulated environment where compliance is crucial.

When new regulations are introduced, fintechs must quickly adapt to ensure they remain compliant, which often requires modifying existing workflows and implementing new systems. This need for agility is compounded by the fact that fintechs often operate across multiple jurisdictions, each with its own set of regulatory requirements.

The extent of the impact varies depending on the specific area of fintech, such as payments, lending, or wealth management, as each sector faces different regulatory challenges.

For instance, a fintech focused on payments might be more affected by changes in anti-money laundering regulations, while a lending platform could be impacted by shifts in consumer protection laws. Ultimately, the ability to adapt quickly to regulatory changes is crucial for fintechs to maintain their competitive edge and continue to innovate in a rapidly evolving market.

Fintechs in competitive markets often allocate 5-7% of revenue for strategic partnerships and collaborations

Fintech companies in competitive markets often allocate 5-7% of their revenue for strategic partnerships and collaborations because these alliances are crucial for gaining a competitive edge.

In such a rapidly evolving industry, forming partnerships can help fintechs access new technologies and expand their customer base more efficiently. By collaborating with other companies, fintechs can also share resources and reduce costs, which is essential for maintaining profitability in a crowded market.

However, the percentage of revenue allocated can vary depending on the specific goals and needs of the company.

For instance, a fintech focusing on international expansion might allocate a higher percentage to partnerships that facilitate entry into new markets. Conversely, a company that is more established might spend less on partnerships, focusing instead on internal development and innovation.

Cloud infrastructure costs should be optimized to stay below 20% of total operating expenses

Cloud infrastructure costs should ideally be kept below 20% of total operating expenses for a fintech company to ensure financial sustainability and competitive pricing.

In the fintech industry, where margins can be tight, keeping cloud costs in check allows more resources to be allocated to innovation and customer acquisition. Additionally, excessive spending on cloud services can lead to higher product costs, which might make it difficult to compete with other players in the market.

However, this percentage can vary depending on the specific needs and scale of the company.

For instance, a startup might initially spend a higher percentage on cloud infrastructure as it builds its platform and scales up. Conversely, a more established fintech company might have optimized its cloud usage over time, allowing it to maintain lower cloud expenses relative to its total operating costs.

Fintechs should aim for a monthly active user (MAU) growth rate of at least 10% to ensure scalability

Fintechs should aim for a monthly active user (MAU) growth rate of at least 10% to ensure scalability because this level of growth indicates a healthy expansion of the user base, which is crucial for long-term success.

Achieving a 10% growth rate in MAU suggests that the fintech is effectively attracting and retaining users, which is essential for building a sustainable business model. This growth rate also helps in maintaining investor confidence, as it demonstrates the company's potential to scale and generate increased revenue over time.

However, the ideal growth rate can vary depending on the specific market conditions and the stage of the company's development.

For instance, a newly launched fintech might experience higher growth rates initially as it captures early adopters, while a more established company might aim for steady growth to maintain its market position. Additionally, fintechs operating in niche markets might have different growth expectations compared to those in more competitive sectors, where the user acquisition strategies and growth metrics could differ significantly.

Seasonal financial product offerings can increase user engagement by up to 15%

Seasonal financial product offerings can boost user engagement by up to 15% because they tap into the natural rhythms and spending habits of consumers.

During certain times of the year, like the holiday season or tax season, people are more inclined to make financial decisions, and fintech companies can capitalize on this by offering tailored products. For example, a fintech app might offer a special savings plan for holiday shopping or a tax-filing service in the spring, aligning with users' immediate needs and increasing their interaction with the platform.

These offerings create a sense of urgency and relevance, encouraging users to engage more frequently with the app.

However, the effectiveness of these seasonal offerings can vary based on factors such as the target demographic and the specific financial product being offered. For instance, a younger audience might respond better to a summer travel savings plan, while older users might be more interested in retirement planning during the end of the year. By understanding these nuances, fintech companies can tailor their seasonal offerings to maximize engagement across different user segments.

Establishing a fraud detection accuracy rate above 95% is a sign of strong risk management

Achieving a fraud detection accuracy rate above 95% is a significant indicator of strong risk management for a fintech company.

Such a high accuracy rate means the company is effectively identifying and mitigating fraudulent activities, which is crucial for maintaining customer trust and protecting financial assets. It also reflects the company's investment in advanced technologies and skilled personnel to monitor and analyze transactions.

However, the effectiveness of fraud detection can vary depending on the specific context and types of transactions involved.

For instance, a company dealing with high-volume, low-value transactions might prioritize speed over accuracy, while one handling large-value transactions might focus more on precision. Therefore, while a 95% accuracy rate is generally impressive, its significance can differ based on the company's operational focus and the nature of its financial activities.

Fintechs should conduct quarterly stress tests to ensure resilience against market volatility.

Fintechs should conduct quarterly stress tests to ensure resilience against market volatility because these tests help identify potential vulnerabilities in their financial systems.

By simulating adverse economic scenarios, fintech companies can assess how their operations would hold up under different conditions, such as a sudden drop in market liquidity or a spike in interest rates. This proactive approach allows them to implement necessary adjustments and maintain financial stability even during turbulent times.

However, the frequency and intensity of these stress tests can vary depending on the specific nature of the fintech's business model and the markets they operate in.

For instance, a fintech focused on peer-to-peer lending might prioritize stress tests that evaluate credit risk, while a company dealing with cryptocurrency exchanges might focus more on market risk and cybersecurity threats. Ultimately, tailoring stress tests to address the unique challenges of each fintech ensures they are better prepared to navigate market fluctuations and protect their clients' interests.