23 data to include in the business plan of your software project

This article was written by our expert who is surveying the industry and constantly updating the business plan for a software development company.

Our business plan for a software development company will help you build a profitable project

Ever wondered what the ideal burn rate should be to ensure your software project remains sustainable?

Or how many active users you need to acquire each month to meet your growth milestones?

And do you know the perfect developer-to-operations ratio for a scalable software development team?

These aren’t just nice-to-know numbers; they’re the metrics that can make or break your project.

If you’re putting together a business plan, investors and stakeholders will scrutinize these numbers to gauge your strategy and potential for success.

In this article, we’ll cover 23 essential data points every software project business plan needs to demonstrate you're prepared and ready to thrive.

Development costs should ideally stay below 30% of total project budget to ensure profitability

A lot of craft breweries' software projects aim to keep development costs under 30% of the total budget to maintain a healthy profit margin.

In the software industry, this percentage is a benchmark that allows for adequate allocation of resources to other critical areas like marketing and customer support. If development costs exceed this threshold, it can lead to budget overruns and compromise the project's financial viability.

However, this percentage can vary depending on the project's complexity and the technology stack being used.

For instance, projects involving cutting-edge technologies or requiring extensive R&D might see higher development costs, which could be justified by the potential for higher returns. Conversely, projects with a well-defined scope and using established technologies might keep development costs even lower, allowing more budget flexibility for other strategic investments.

Software projects should aim for a break-even point within 12-24 months to be considered viable

Insiders often say that software projects should aim for a break-even point within 12-24 months to be considered viable because this timeframe aligns with typical investment cycles and market dynamics.

Investors and stakeholders usually expect a return on investment within this period to ensure that the project is not only sustainable but also competitive in a rapidly evolving market. If a project takes longer to break even, it risks becoming obsolete due to technological advancements or shifts in consumer demand.

However, this timeframe can vary significantly depending on the nature of the software and its target market.

For instance, enterprise software solutions might have a longer break-even period due to complex integration and longer sales cycles, whereas consumer-focused apps might need to break even faster to capitalize on trending opportunities. Ultimately, understanding the specific context and market conditions is crucial for setting realistic financial goals for any software project.

The average turnover rate for software developers is 13.2%, so budget for moderate recruiting and training costs

Most people overlook the fact that the turnover rate for software developers is influenced by several nuanced factors that aren't immediately obvious.

One key reason is the high demand for tech talent, which creates a competitive job market where developers frequently receive enticing offers from other companies. Additionally, the rapid pace of technological change means developers must constantly update their skills, leading some to switch jobs for better learning opportunities.

In some cases, companies with strong developer cultures and robust career development programs experience lower turnover rates.

Conversely, organizations that fail to provide meaningful work or a supportive environment may see higher turnover. It's crucial to understand that turnover can vary significantly based on factors like company size, industry sector, and geographic location.

80% of software projects fail to meet their original goals, largely due to scope creep and mismanagement

It's worth knowing that 80% of software projects fail to meet their original goals, primarily due to scope creep and mismanagement.

Scope creep often occurs when stakeholders continuously add new features without proper evaluation, leading to a bloated project that strays from its initial objectives. Mismanagement, on the other hand, can stem from poor communication between teams, lack of clear leadership, or inadequate resource allocation.

In many cases, the agile methodology is employed to mitigate these issues, but it requires strict adherence to its principles to be effective.

However, the impact of these factors can vary significantly depending on the project's size, complexity, and the industry in which it operates. For instance, enterprise-level projects often face more significant challenges due to their scale, while smaller projects might suffer more from resource constraints and limited expertise.

Effective agile practices can increase project delivery speed by 20-30%

Maybe you knew it already, but effective agile practices can boost project delivery speed by 20-30% in software development.

One reason is that agile methodologies emphasize iterative development, allowing teams to deliver small, functional pieces of software quickly. This approach reduces the time spent on extensive upfront planning and enables faster feedback loops, which can significantly accelerate the development process.

Moreover, agile practices promote cross-functional collaboration, which helps in identifying and resolving issues more swiftly, further enhancing delivery speed.

However, the impact of agile practices can vary depending on factors like team maturity and project complexity. For instance, teams with high agile maturity and projects with well-defined scopes tend to see more pronounced improvements in delivery speed compared to those still adapting to agile or dealing with highly complex, ambiguous projects.

A successful software project maintains a defect rate below 1% of total lines of code

Believe it or not, maintaining a defect rate below 1% of total lines of code is a hallmark of a successful software project because it reflects a high level of code quality and robust testing practices.

In the software industry, achieving this low defect rate often involves implementing continuous integration and automated testing to catch issues early in the development cycle. These practices help ensure that code is not only functional but also maintainable and scalable, which is crucial for long-term project success.

However, the acceptable defect rate can vary depending on the project's domain and complexity.

For instance, in safety-critical systems like aviation software, even a 1% defect rate might be considered too high, necessitating more stringent quality assurance measures. Conversely, in rapidly evolving fields like web development, a slightly higher defect rate might be tolerated due to the fast-paced nature of updates and iterations.

Code review processes can reduce bugs by up to 60% before deployment

Experts say that a well-structured code review process can reduce bugs by up to 60% before deployment due to its ability to catch errors early in the development cycle.

During code reviews, developers often identify logical errors and inconsistencies that automated tests might miss, which significantly contributes to this reduction. Additionally, the process encourages knowledge sharing among team members, which can lead to more robust and error-free code.

However, the effectiveness of code reviews can vary depending on factors such as the complexity of the project and the experience level of the reviewers.

In projects with a high degree of complexity, code reviews might not catch every bug, but they still play a crucial role in identifying potential issues. Conversely, in teams with highly experienced developers, the process can be even more effective, as seasoned reviewers are more adept at spotting subtle errors and providing valuable feedback.

Software maintenance and updates should account for 15-20% of the total project budget annually

Few craft breweries' software systems are as complex as those in large enterprises, yet both require diligent maintenance and updates.

In the software industry, it's a well-known fact that technical debt accumulates over time, which can lead to increased costs if not addressed regularly. By allocating 15-20% of the total project budget annually for maintenance, companies can ensure that they are not only fixing bugs but also enhancing system performance and security.

Moreover, this budget allocation allows for the integration of new technologies and features that keep the software competitive and relevant in a rapidly evolving market.

However, the percentage can vary depending on the software's complexity and the industry it serves. For instance, a mission-critical application in the healthcare sector might require a higher budget allocation due to stringent compliance requirements and the need for constant updates to address emerging threats.

Cloud infrastructure costs should not exceed 10-15% of total revenue to avoid financial strain

Please, include that in your business plan.

Cloud infrastructure costs should ideally remain within 10-15% of total revenue to prevent financial strain, as exceeding this threshold can lead to unsustainable operational expenses that may hinder growth and innovation. This percentage is a benchmark derived from industry analysis, where maintaining a balance between cost efficiency and scalability is crucial for software companies. Companies that exceed this range often find themselves in a position where they must either cut back on essential services or pass costs onto customers, which can be detrimental to customer retention and market competitiveness.

However, this percentage can vary significantly depending on the business model and stage of the company. For instance, early-stage startups might allocate a higher percentage of their revenue to cloud costs as they focus on rapid scaling and product development, whereas mature companies with established customer bases might aim for a lower percentage to maximize profitability.

Additionally, companies with a highly variable workload might experience fluctuations in cloud spending, necessitating a more flexible approach to budgeting. Ultimately, the key is to align cloud spending with strategic business goals, ensuring that it supports rather than hinders the company's long-term vision.

Continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI

A precious insight for you, CI/CD pipelines are the backbone of modern software development, ensuring rapid and reliable delivery of code changes.

One insider secret is that the effectiveness of CI/CD is heavily dependent on the quality of automated tests, which can make or break the deployment process. Additionally, the choice of orchestration tools like Jenkins, GitLab CI, or CircleCI can significantly impact the efficiency and scalability of the pipeline.

In some cases, teams might opt for a trunk-based development approach, which allows for more frequent integrations and reduces the complexity of merging branches.

However, this approach might not be suitable for all projects, especially those with large, distributed teams where feature branches are necessary to manage concurrent development efforts. Ultimately, the success of CI/CD varies based on factors like team size, project complexity, and the maturity of the codebase.

CD) can reduce time-to-market by 50%

This is insider knowledge here, but Continuous Delivery (CD) can significantly reduce time-to-market by streamlining the software release process.

By automating the deployment pipeline, CD minimizes manual interventions, which are often bottlenecks in traditional release cycles. This automation not only accelerates the process but also enhances the reliability of releases, as it reduces the risk of human error.

Moreover, CD allows for incremental updates, enabling teams to deliver new features and fixes more frequently and with less risk.

However, the extent of time reduction can vary depending on factors such as the complexity of the software and the maturity of the existing infrastructure. In cases where the software architecture is monolithic, the benefits might be less pronounced compared to microservices-based architectures, which are inherently more adaptable to CD practices.

A software project should have a test coverage of at least 70% to ensure quality and reliability

Most of the craft breweries' software projects aim for a test coverage of at least 70% to ensure quality and reliability because it provides a solid baseline for identifying potential issues before they reach production.

In the software development lifecycle, achieving this level of coverage helps in catching a significant portion of bugs, which is crucial for maintaining system stability and user trust. Additionally, it allows developers to refactor code with confidence, knowing that a substantial portion of the codebase is being tested, thus reducing the risk of introducing new bugs.

However, the ideal test coverage can vary depending on the project's complexity and domain-specific requirements.

For instance, in safety-critical systems like medical software or aviation control systems, higher test coverage, often above 90%, is necessary due to the potential consequences of failure. Conversely, in rapidly evolving projects or startups where speed is prioritized, a slightly lower coverage might be acceptable to allow for faster iterations and deployment.

It's common for software projects to lose 5-10% of productivity due to technical debt

Not a very surprising fact, but software projects often see a 5-10% dip in productivity due to technical debt.

Technical debt accumulates when short-term solutions are implemented to meet deadlines, which can lead to complex codebases that are hard to maintain. This complexity often results in increased bug rates and longer time spent on debugging, which directly impacts productivity.

Moreover, the impact of technical debt can vary significantly depending on the project's lifecycle stage and the team's familiarity with the codebase.

For instance, in the early stages of a project, technical debt might be less noticeable because the focus is on rapid development and feature delivery. However, as the project matures, the compounding effects of technical debt become more pronounced, leading to a more significant productivity loss.

Effective backlog grooming can increase team productivity by 15-20%

This valuable insight stems from the fact that effective backlog grooming ensures that the team is always working on the most relevant and prioritized tasks, which directly impacts productivity.

By regularly refining the backlog, teams can eliminate technical debt and reduce the time spent on unnecessary tasks, which often leads to a 15-20% increase in productivity. Additionally, it helps in maintaining a clear roadmap for the team, ensuring that everyone is aligned and focused on the same goals.

However, the impact of backlog grooming can vary depending on the team's maturity and the complexity of the project.

For instance, a team working on a highly complex software project might see a more significant productivity boost due to the increased need for clarity and prioritization. On the other hand, a team with a well-established process might experience a smaller increase, as they may already have efficient workflows in place.

The average profit margin for a software company is 20-25%, with higher margins for SaaS and lower for custom solutions

This insight into profit margins reflects the unique cost structures and revenue models inherent in different types of software businesses.

For SaaS companies, the recurring revenue model and economies of scale allow them to achieve higher margins, as they can spread development and maintenance costs over a large customer base. In contrast, companies offering custom software solutions often face lower margins due to the high labor costs and the need for specialized development teams tailored to each project.

Moreover, SaaS companies benefit from a subscription-based model that provides predictable revenue streams, which is less volatile compared to the project-based income of custom solutions.

However, these margins can vary significantly based on factors such as market competition and the company's ability to innovate and differentiate its offerings. Additionally, companies that invest heavily in customer acquisition and retention strategies may experience lower margins initially, but these investments can lead to higher profitability in the long run.

Customer acquisition cost (CAC) should be recovered within 12 months to ensure sustainable growth

This data does not come as a surprise.

In the software industry, especially with SaaS models, the subscription-based revenue structure means that companies rely on recurring payments to sustain operations. If the CAC is not recovered within 12 months, it can strain cash flow, making it difficult to reinvest in growth initiatives or product development.

Moreover, a longer CAC recovery period can indicate inefficiencies in the customer acquisition strategy, potentially leading to higher churn rates and reduced lifetime value.

However, this 12-month benchmark can vary depending on the target market and product type. For instance, enterprise software solutions might have a longer CAC recovery period due to higher upfront costs and longer sales cycles, whereas consumer-focused apps might aim for a shorter recovery period to quickly scale and capture market share.

Ideally, a software project should maintain a current ratio (assets to liabilities) of 1.5:1

Yes, maintaining a current ratio of 1.5:1 is often recommended for software projects because it provides a buffer against unforeseen expenses and ensures liquidity.

In the software industry, projects can face unexpected challenges such as scope creep or technical debt, which can quickly increase liabilities. A 1.5:1 ratio helps ensure that there are enough assets to cover these potential liabilities without stalling the project.

Moreover, this ratio allows for flexibility in resource allocation, enabling teams to pivot or scale as needed without financial strain.

However, this ideal ratio can vary depending on the project lifecycle stage or the business model. For instance, early-stage startups might operate with a lower ratio due to high initial investments, while mature companies might maintain a higher ratio to safeguard against market volatility.

Effective user experience (UX) design can boost user retention by 25-30%

Did you know that effective user experience (UX) design can boost user retention by 25-30%?

One reason is that a well-designed UX reduces the cognitive load on users, making it easier for them to navigate and use the software. This leads to a more intuitive interaction, which in turn increases the likelihood of users returning to the platform.

Moreover, UX design that incorporates personalization features can significantly enhance user engagement by tailoring the experience to individual preferences.

However, the impact of UX design on user retention can vary depending on the target audience and the complexity of the software. For instance, enterprise software with a steep learning curve might see a more pronounced improvement in retention rates when UX is optimized, compared to a simple mobile app where the baseline retention is already high.

A software project should allocate 5-10% of the budget for security measures to protect against breaches

This data-driven recommendation to allocate 5-10% of a software project's budget for security measures is rooted in the need to balance cost with effective risk management.

Insiders know that the threat landscape is constantly evolving, and without adequate investment, a project is vulnerable to zero-day exploits and other sophisticated attacks. Moreover, the cost of a breach, including reputation damage and regulatory fines, often far exceeds the initial investment in security.

However, this percentage can vary depending on the industry sector and the specific risk profile of the software being developed.

For instance, a financial services application handling sensitive data might require a higher allocation due to stricter compliance requirements and higher stakes. Conversely, a small-scale internal tool with limited exposure might justify a lower percentage, focusing instead on basic security hygiene and regular audits.

Version control systems can reduce code conflicts by 40-50%

This data point highlights how version control systems (VCS) can significantly reduce code conflicts by 40-50%.

One of the key reasons is that VCS allows for branching and merging, which enables developers to work on isolated features without interfering with the main codebase. This isolation minimizes the risk of conflicts when changes are eventually integrated, as developers can resolve issues in their own branches before merging.

Moreover, VCS provides a history of changes, allowing developers to track and understand modifications, which aids in conflict resolution.

However, the effectiveness of VCS in reducing conflicts can vary depending on the team's workflow and the complexity of the project. Teams that follow a continuous integration approach tend to experience fewer conflicts, as changes are integrated more frequently, allowing for quicker detection and resolution of potential issues.

Digital marketing should take up about 5-7% of revenue, especially for new or growing software products

Actually, the 5-7% revenue allocation for digital marketing in software is a strategic move to ensure optimal market penetration and brand visibility.

For new or growing software products, this percentage is crucial because it allows for a balanced investment in both customer acquisition and brand awareness. The software industry is highly competitive, and without a significant digital marketing budget, a product might struggle to gain traction in a crowded market.

Moreover, digital marketing in software often involves a mix of performance marketing and content-driven strategies, which require a substantial budget to execute effectively.

However, this percentage can vary depending on the product lifecycle stage and the specific market dynamics. For instance, a mature product with a strong market presence might allocate a smaller percentage to digital marketing, focusing instead on customer retention and upselling, while a startup might need to invest more aggressively to establish its brand.

Regular performance testing can increase application speed by 15-20%

It's very common for regular performance testing to boost application speed by 15-20% due to the identification and resolution of bottlenecks.

Performance testing helps in uncovering hidden inefficiencies in the code, such as memory leaks or inefficient algorithms, which can be optimized for better speed. Additionally, it allows developers to simulate real-world usage patterns, ensuring that the application can handle peak loads without degrading performance.

However, the extent of speed improvement can vary depending on the initial state of the application and the complexity of the system architecture.

For instance, applications with a monolithic architecture might see more significant improvements compared to those with a microservices architecture, where performance issues are often isolated. Moreover, the frequency and depth of performance testing play a crucial role; more frequent and comprehensive tests can lead to more consistent performance gains.

Establishing a code churn rate below 10% month-to-month is a sign of strong development practices

A lot of software development teams consider a code churn rate below 10% month-to-month as indicative of strong development practices because it suggests that the team is not frequently rewriting or discarding large portions of their codebase.

High code churn can often be a sign of unstable requirements or poor initial design, which can lead to increased technical debt and reduced productivity. By maintaining a lower churn rate, teams demonstrate that they have a clear understanding of the project requirements and a solid architectural foundation.

However, it's important to note that the ideal churn rate can vary depending on the stage of development or the nature of the project.

For instance, in the early stages of a project, a higher churn rate might be acceptable as the team is still experimenting and iterating on the design. Conversely, in a mature product, a low churn rate is more desirable as it indicates stability and reliability in the codebase.