How much to budget for fuel in transportation?

This article was written by our expert who is surveying the industry and constantly updating the business plan for a transportation company.

Who wrote this content?

The Dojo Business Team

A team of financial experts, consultants, and writers

We're a team of finance experts, consultants, market analysts, and specialized writers dedicated to helping new entrepreneurs launch their businesses. We help you avoid costly mistakes by providing detailed business plans, accurate market studies, and reliable financial forecasts to maximize your chances of success from day one—especially in the transportation company market.

How many kilometers or miles should I expect my transportation vehicles to drive each week, month, and year?

The distance your transportation company's vehicles will drive depends on whether you operate light delivery vehicles, medium vans, or heavy trucks for long-haul freight.

Light passenger vehicles in the UK average 135 miles per week, 583 miles per month, and 7,000 miles annually. However, commercial vehicles in transportation operations typically exceed these figures substantially. In Canada, vehicles average 15,200 kilometers (9,445 miles) per year, translating to approximately 292 km (182 miles) weekly, while Australian commercial vehicles log around 12,100 kilometers annually or 233 km per week.

For transportation companies, vehicle type significantly impacts distance patterns. Petrol-powered cars average 6,100 miles yearly, while diesel vehicles—more common in commercial fleets—reach 8,300 miles per year on average due to their use in delivery and freight operations. If you operate courier vans or delivery vehicles, expect weekly distances in the 300-500 mile range. Long-haul trucking operations will see substantially higher figures, with individual trucks potentially covering 2,000-3,000 miles weekly or 100,000-130,000 miles annually.

Your specific mileage depends on service area, delivery density, route efficiency, and whether you handle local deliveries or regional/national freight. Transportation companies should track actual mileage for the first 3-6 months to establish accurate baseline figures for their specific operations.

What type of vehicle should I use for my transportation business and what is its fuel consumption?

Vehicle selection for your transportation company directly determines fuel consumption rates and overall operating costs.

For a new transportation company, courier vans at 9.7 L/100km represent the most common starting point for delivery services. A van driving 1,000 miles monthly consumes approximately 156 liters (41 gallons) of fuel. Heavy trucks at 40+ L/100km are essential for freight operations but require substantially larger fuel budgets—the same 1,000 miles requires approximately 643 liters (170 gallons).

You'll find detailed market insights in our transportation company business plan, updated every quarter.

What type of fuel do transportation vehicles require and what are current prices in October 2025?

Most transportation company vehicles operate on either petrol (gasoline) or diesel, with diesel being the dominant choice for commercial fleets due to better fuel efficiency and engine durability.

Diesel engines deliver 20-30% better fuel economy than petrol equivalents, making them the standard for delivery vans, medium trucks, and heavy freight vehicles. Petrol vehicles are typically used only for light courier work or passenger transport services. Some transportation companies are transitioning to hybrid or electric vehicles for urban delivery routes, though these remain a small percentage of commercial fleets as of October 2025.

Regional fuel pricing varies significantly and directly impacts your transportation company's operating costs. In the UAE, Super 98 Petrol costs AED 2.77 per liter ($0.75 USD) while diesel runs AED 2.71 per liter ($0.74 USD) as of October 2025. Thailand offers lower prices with premium gasoline at approximately USD $1.33 per liter. Global markets show prices ranging from $1.30 to $2.80 per liter depending on location, with North American markets typically pricing by the gallon ($5.00-$10.50 per gallon).

Transportation companies must factor their specific operating region's fuel costs into budgets. A delivery van consuming 9.7 L/100km driving 2,000 km monthly requires 194 liters of diesel. At UAE pricing ($0.74/liter), monthly fuel costs reach $144, while at higher regional pricing ($2.00/liter), the same operation costs $388 monthly.

How often do fuel prices change and what are the current trends?

Fuel prices adjust monthly in most markets, requiring transportation companies to review budgets regularly rather than setting annual fixed rates.

The UAE updates petrol and diesel prices monthly through a government committee that reviews global oil markets. Indonesia follows a similar monthly adjustment cycle. Most developed markets including the United States, Canada, Australia, and European countries see price fluctuations that effectively change on a weekly basis based on crude oil prices, though official rate changes often occur monthly or quarterly.

October 2025 trends show slight increases for petrol prices globally, reflecting typical seasonal patterns as winter approaches in the Northern Hemisphere. Diesel prices remain more stable but show variable changes depending on regional supply and demand factors. The global oil market influences all regional pricing, with geopolitical events, OPEC decisions, and economic conditions creating volatility that transportation companies must anticipate.

For your transportation business, implement monthly fuel budget reviews aligned with regional price adjustment schedules. Track price trends over 6-12 months to identify seasonal patterns in your operating area. Some transportation companies use fuel price hedging or bulk purchase agreements to reduce volatility, though these options typically require larger fleet sizes to be cost-effective.

What is the primary purpose of my transportation operations and how does it affect fuel needs?

Your transportation company's service model—whether commuting, commercial deliveries, long-distance freight, or mixed operations—fundamentally determines fuel consumption patterns and budgeting requirements.

Commercial delivery operations using diesel vans typically see higher annual mileage (8,300+ miles) compared to petrol vehicles due to the efficiency demands of daily routes. Long-distance freight operations require the largest absolute fuel budgets due to heavy truck consumption rates of 40+ L/100km, even though highway driving offers better efficiency than urban stop-start patterns.

This is one of the strategies explained in our transportation company business plan.

How do different driving conditions affect my transportation company's fuel consumption?

Urban traffic, highway routes, and mountainous terrain create significant variations in fuel consumption that transportation companies must account for in budget planning.

Urban driving conditions increase fuel consumption by 15-30% compared to highway driving due to frequent stops, idling at traffic lights, and lower average speeds. A delivery van that achieves 9.7 L/100km on highway routes may consume 11.2-12.6 L/100km in city traffic. For transportation companies operating primarily in urban areas—such as last-mile delivery services—this higher consumption rate must be factored into every route calculation.

Highway routes offer the best fuel efficiency for transportation operations. Vehicles maintain steady speeds with minimal braking, allowing engines to operate in optimal fuel consumption ranges. Long-haul freight companies benefit most from highway efficiency, though they still face consumption increases when routes include significant elevation changes.

Mountainous terrain significantly impacts fuel costs for transportation companies. Climbing grades increases consumption by 20-40% compared to flat highway driving, while descending grades offer some recovery through engine braking. Transportation businesses operating in regions like the Rocky Mountains, Appalachia, or Alpine areas must budget substantially higher per-mile fuel costs. A heavy truck climbing sustained mountain grades may see consumption rates exceed 50 L/100km compared to the 40 L/100km baseline.

For accurate budgeting, analyze your actual routes and classify them by terrain type. A transportation company with 60% urban routes, 30% highway, and 10% mountain driving should weight fuel consumption accordingly rather than using a single average figure.

How many vehicles do I need in my transportation fleet and how does this affect fuel budgeting?

Fleet size and vehicle type standardization directly impact fuel budgeting complexity and total fuel costs for transportation companies.

Starting transportation businesses typically begin with 1-3 vehicles to test operations and establish routes. This allows for straightforward fuel tracking and budget management. As you scale to 5-10 vehicles, fuel becomes one of your largest expense categories, requiring systematic tracking and forecasting. Transportation companies with 10+ vehicles should implement fleet management software that tracks fuel consumption by vehicle, route, and driver to identify inefficiencies.

Standardizing your fleet around similar vehicle types simplifies fuel budgeting for transportation operations. If all delivery vans have the same 9.7 L/100km consumption rate, you can accurately predict total fuel needs by multiplying vehicle count by average monthly distance. Mixed fleets with varied vehicle types—combining light vans (7.0 L/100km), medium vans (9.7 L/100km), and heavy trucks (40+ L/100km)—require individual vehicle tracking and more complex budget models.

For example, a transportation company operating five identical delivery vans, each driving 2,000 km monthly at 9.7 L/100km, requires 970 liters monthly (5 vehicles × 194 liters each). At $1.50 per liter, monthly fuel costs total $1,455. Adding one heavy truck driving 3,000 km monthly at 40 L/100km adds another 1,200 liters ($1,800), increasing total monthly fuel costs to $3,255.

We cover this exact topic in the transportation company business plan.

What seasonal factors increase fuel consumption in transportation operations?

Seasonal variations in transportation demand, weather conditions, and vehicle climate control requirements create predictable fuel consumption patterns that must be included in annual budgets.

• Winter heating requirements: Cold weather increases fuel consumption by 10-15% in most climates. Diesel engines require longer warm-up periods, and heated cabs draw additional power. Transportation companies in northern regions should budget higher fuel costs from November through March.
• Summer air conditioning: Running air conditioning increases fuel consumption by 5-10% during hot months. Transportation businesses in warm climates face year-round AC costs, while temperate regions see increases from June through September.
• Holiday season demand: Transportation companies handling deliveries see volume spikes from November through December, often requiring 20-40% more vehicle trips and corresponding fuel increases. Fourth-quarter fuel budgets should reflect this seasonal peak.
• Weather-related route changes: Winter storms, flooding, or extreme heat can force transportation companies onto longer alternative routes, increasing per-delivery fuel consumption unpredictably. Budget an additional 5-10% contingency during seasons with severe weather risks in your operating region.
• Peak agriculture/harvest seasons: Transportation companies serving agricultural regions see demand spikes during harvest periods, typically spring and fall depending on location. Freight volume increases drive corresponding fuel budget needs.

For annual planning, transportation companies should model monthly fuel budgets that account for these seasonal factors rather than dividing annual estimates into equal monthly amounts. A delivery-focused transportation business might allocate 12-15% of annual fuel budget to December alone, while summer months may represent only 7-8% each.

Should I factor in tolls, idling, and delays when budgeting transportation fuel costs?

Tolls don't directly affect fuel consumption, but idling and traffic delays significantly increase fuel use and must be included in transportation company budgets.

Vehicle idling consumes 0.6-1.0 liters of fuel per hour depending on engine size, even though the vehicle isn't moving. Transportation companies operating in congested urban areas or at loading docks where drivers wait with engines running can lose 5-15% of fuel efficiency to idling. A delivery van idling for 2 hours daily wastes approximately 40-60 liters monthly—equivalent to $60-$120 in unnecessary fuel costs per vehicle at typical pricing.

Traffic delays and congestion reduce fuel efficiency by forcing vehicles into stop-and-go patterns rather than steady cruising speeds. Transportation companies should add 10-20% to baseline urban fuel budgets to account for congestion delays. Route optimization software can help minimize these costs by avoiding peak traffic periods and congested corridors.

While tolls are operational costs rather than fuel costs, they impact route selection which affects fuel consumption. A toll road offering a direct 50-mile highway route versus a toll-free 70-mile route through urban areas may actually save money overall—the $5 toll cost is offset by fuel savings from 20 fewer miles and better highway efficiency. Transportation companies should evaluate total cost per route, not just fuel in isolation.

Border crossings, weigh station stops, and loading/unloading times all contribute to idling and should be factored into fuel estimates. Long-haul transportation operations crossing multiple states or provinces may lose 10-20 hours monthly to required stops, translating to 6-20 liters of fuel wasted per vehicle monthly.

What alternative transportation modes or route sharing options can reduce fuel costs?

Transportation companies can significantly reduce fuel consumption through route optimization, load consolidation, and strategic use of alternative modes for specific operations.

Route pooling combines multiple deliveries or pickups along optimized paths rather than making individual trips for each customer. A transportation company making 10 separate round trips of 20 miles each (200 total miles) can potentially consolidate into 2-3 optimized routes covering 80-100 miles total. This 50% mileage reduction translates directly to 50% fuel savings on those operations. Route optimization software is essential for transportation businesses once you exceed 15-20 daily stops.

Backhaul planning reduces empty return trips that waste fuel. Transportation companies should actively seek return loads for long-haul routes. A truck making a 500-mile delivery and returning empty wastes 1,000 miles of fuel consumption. Finding a partial or full return load improves fuel efficiency by converting "dead miles" into revenue miles, effectively cutting per-delivery fuel costs in half.

Intermodal options combine trucking with rail or sea transport for long distances. Transportation companies handling freight over 500+ miles should evaluate whether rail transfer reduces total costs. While adding handling complexity, rail transport costs approximately 30-50% less per mile than trucking for long distances. A transportation business might truck freight 100 miles to a rail terminal, ship 800 miles by rail, then truck the final 100 miles—total fuel consumption for 200 truck miles rather than 1,000.

Mixed vehicle deployment assigns appropriate vehicle sizes to specific routes. Using a small van (7.0 L/100km) for light deliveries rather than a standard van (9.7 L/100km) saves 28% fuel per kilometer. Transportation companies should match vehicle capacity to actual load requirements rather than defaulting to one vehicle size for all operations.

What transportation demand growth should I plan for and how does it affect fuel budgets?

Transportation companies typically experience 10-30% annual growth in early years, requiring fuel budgets that scale accordingly and account for fleet expansion timing.

New transportation businesses should model three growth scenarios for year-one fuel budgets: conservative (10% quarterly growth), moderate (20% quarterly), and aggressive (30% quarterly). In a conservative scenario, a transportation company starting with monthly fuel costs of $2,000 would end year one at approximately $2,900 monthly. Under aggressive growth, the same company reaches $4,600 monthly by month 12. These dramatically different endpoints require flexible budgeting and working capital planning.

Fleet expansion timing critically affects fuel budgets for growing transportation companies. Adding vehicles in month 6 requires fuel budget increases starting immediately, not at year-end. A new delivery van adds approximately $400-800 monthly fuel costs depending on route distance and regional pricing. Transportation companies should align vehicle acquisition with confirmed customer contracts rather than speculative growth to avoid burning capital on underutilized assets.

Seasonal growth patterns affect year-two planning. Transportation businesses that experience 40% volume increases during holiday peaks but only 15% annual baseline growth need budgets reflecting both trends. Year-two fuel budgets should account for higher absolute seasonal peaks built on top of the elevated baseline from year-one growth.

What contingency margin should transportation companies add for fuel price volatility?

Transportation companies should budget a 10-20% contingency margin above baseline fuel costs to absorb price spikes and unexpected operational needs.

A 10% contingency margin suits transportation businesses in regions with relatively stable fuel prices and predictable operations. This covers minor price increases (5-10% annually) and occasional unplanned trips or route extensions. For a transportation company with $3,000 monthly baseline fuel costs, a 10% contingency adds $300 monthly or $3,600 annually to the fuel budget.

A 20% contingency margin is appropriate for transportation companies facing higher volatility—those operating in markets with frequent price adjustments, businesses with unpredictable demand patterns, or companies in growth phases where exact route volumes remain uncertain. This larger buffer protects against price spikes of 15-20% and covers significant unplanned mileage increases. The same $3,000 baseline with 20% contingency requires $3,600 monthly budgeting or $7,200 additional annually.

Transportation businesses should review actual contingency usage quarterly. If you consistently use less than 5% of contingency, you're over-budgeting and tying up capital unnecessarily. If you regularly exceed contingency margins, either baseline estimates are too low or operational inefficiencies need addressing. Track fuel costs per mile or per delivery as key performance indicators to identify efficiency trends.

Fuel surcharge mechanisms in customer contracts can shift price volatility risk away from transportation companies. Many freight and delivery businesses include automatic fuel surcharges that adjust monthly based on regional fuel price indices. This transfers price risk to customers while stabilizing transportation company margins. However, competitive markets may resist surcharges, requiring full contingency budgeting as the primary protection.

It's a key part of what we outline in the transportation company business plan.

Conclusion

This article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Readers are encouraged to consult with a qualified professional before making any investment decisions. We accept no liability for any actions taken based on the information provided.